EU report: Evaluation of Ukrainian reforms shows considerable progress but need to accelerate implementation to reap full benefits

November 16th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

The report, which was published yesterday, provides in section 2.3 ‘Justice, Freedom and Security’, amongst others: “The implementation of justice reforms continued. The perceived level of judicial independence remains very low but is increasing according to the latest survey by the World Economic Forum of businesses’ perceptions.”

The report is available here (see pages 6-8 for section 2.3 ‘Justice, Freedom and Security’).

Joint UNBA-CCBE conference on Advocates’ Rights and Obligations in Investigative Proceedings

October 31st, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

capture

Date: 10 November 2017

Place: Kiev, Ukraine

Programme: click here to access the programme.

Poland: Preliminary observations by the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers

October 31st, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

Preliminary observations on the official visit to Poland (23-27 October 2017) by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Mr. Diego  García-Sayán,Warsaw, 27 October 2017:

Preliminary conclusions and recommendations

The independence of justice is under serious threat in Poland today.

I acknowledge that the reform and modernization of judicial institutions is a legitimate objective for any Government to pursue. However, I cannot but stress that the judicial reform that the Polish Government is putting in place to address the shortcomings currently affecting the Polish judicial system will, in the long run, have a long-lasting, adverse effect on the independence of its judicial system.

The current reform, undertaken by the governing majority in haste, and without proper consultation with the opposition, the judiciary and civil society actors, including the Office of the Ombudsman, risks hampering the capacity of judicial authorities to ensure checks and balances and protect and promote human rights.

The first victim of this unilateral approach is the Constitutional Tribunal, whose authority has been seriously undermined by the dispute currently underway relating to its composition and the legality of the some of its ruling. In such circumstances, the Tribunal is actually in no position to ensure an effective constitutional review of the acts adopted by the legislative authorities.

It is high time that all political forces commit to sit at the negotiating table and engage in good faith in a constructive dialogue aimed at restoring the authority of the Tribunal and its role as guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution.

Any long-lasting solution to the constitutional situation that Poland is facing today should be firmly rooted on the principles of the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers, and take into account previous rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, such as those of 3 and 9 December 2015.

The same principles apply to the reform of the ordinary court system, the Supreme Court and the National Council of the Judiciary. The independence of the judiciary is enshrined in the Polish Constitution, and it is the duty of the Government and legislative authority to respect and protect this essential principle of rule of law. In accordance with the principle of separation of powers, the Government and the Parliament must refrain from any inappropriate or unwarranted interference with the judicial process, particularly in relation to the appointment, dismissal and promotion of members of the judiciary.

They must also ensure that any modification of the mandatory retirement age does not adversely impact the security of tenure of judges.

The way out of this critical moment is to promote a fair, open and transparent process involving not only the parliamentary majority and the opposition, but also the judiciary, the Office of the Ombudsman and civil society actors. Any reform of the judiciary should aim at strengthening, not at undermining, the independence of the justice system and its actors. The independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers must constitute the guiding principles of any such reform.

***

You can read the full preliminary observations here.

Council of Europe: Outcome of the Parliamentary Assembly session on 10-13 October 2017

October 16th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

59e0b9e699e44

PACE, 10-13 October 2017, Strasbourg

Amongst others, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) concluded as follows at its session:

New threats to the rule of law in Council of Europe member States: selected examples: Resolution 2188 (2017) of the Parliamentary Assembly

“The Assembly has thoroughly examined the situation in five member States: Bulgaria, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania and Turkey. Although the list of problems found in those States does not include all of those to be found in Council of Europe member States, the Assembly is concerned about some recent developments which put at risk respect for the rule of law, and, in particular, the independence of the judiciary and the principle of the separation of powers. This is mainly due to tendencies to limit the independence of the judiciary made though attempts to politicise the judicial councils and the courts (mainly in Bulgaria, Poland and Turkey), massive revocation of judges and prosecutors (Turkey) or attempts to do so (Poland) and tendencies to limit the legislative power of the parliament (the Republic of Moldova, Romania and Turkey). Moreover, corruption, which is a major challenge to the rule of law, remains a widespread phenomenon in Bulgaria, the Republic of Moldova and Romania.” (To read the entire Resolution, click here.)

Venice Commission’s “Rule of Law Checklist”

The Assembly decides to:

6.1. endorse the Venice Commission’s Rule of Law Checklist;
6.2. use it systematically in its work, particularly in the preparation of reports of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights and the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee), in order to accurately identify any structural and systemic problems in the Council of Europe’s member States;
6.3. invite the national parliaments and government bodies, including the relevant ministries, when assessing the need for and the content of legislative reform, to refer systematically to the Rule of Law Checklist;
6.4. invite international and regional organisations, including the Council of Europe as a whole and the European Union, to refer regularly to the Rule of Law Checklist in their relevant work. In this connection, the Assembly congratulates the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on having taken the Rule of Law Checklist into account in his 2017 annual report on the situation of democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Europe, and urges him to do so systematically in all his future annual reports;
6.5. encourage civil society to use the Rule of Law Checklist to objectively assess respect for the rule of law.
(To read the entire document, click here.)
Please click here for more information on the results of the PACE session.

UNBA-CCBE Joint Conference, 10 November 2017, Kiev

September 25th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

kiev-pechersk-lavra-2652571__340

The Ukrainian National Bar Association (UNBA) and CCBE will hold a joint conference on 10 November 2017 in Kiev, Ukraine.

The conference will discuss ‘Advocates’ rights and obligations in investigative proceedings’, including the following issues:

a) Searches of advocate’s premises and seizures of documents and computer equipment;

b) Summoning advocates as witnesses in cases against their clients;

c) Demands for privileged documents and information;

d) Covert investigative actions against an advocate;

e) Damage to advocates’ property during investigative actions;

f) Denying advocates’ access to the location under investigative actions;

g) Criminal liability for providing legal advice.

More information on the conference will be made available in due course on this Blog.

CCBE supports the Georgian Bar Association’s proposed reforms

September 14th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

The CCBE addressed a letter to the Georgian Parliament in which it expressed its full support to the reforms proposed by the Georgian Bar Association. The CCBE urged the Parliament to take forward the following proposals:

(-) To end the existing prohibition of the Bar President to practice

A CCBE survey in 2015, showed that in none of the responding countries (23), the Bar President was prohibited from practicing. Bars and Law Societies consider it crucial that their presidents are practicing lawyers as they are aware through their daily practice about the prevailing issues that the profession is facing. Prohibiting a Bar President to practice would constitute a real economic risk as the he/she might loose his/her client base during tenure. The matter is traditionally part of the self-regulatory competences of the bars and law societies.

(-) To provide for a comprehensive framework for the internship programme

According to the proposals of the Georgian Bar Association, future lawyers would have to follow three months of training at the High School of Advocates which includes courses on legal skills, management skills, as well as other professional skills which are important to the practice of the profession. The trainee lawyers would then need to carry out nine months of practical training in a law firm, supervised by a lawyer. Trainee lawyers will need to observe the standards of professional conduct of the Georgian Bar during their internship. The CCBE believes that the proposed reform will greatly contribute to further a high standard of legal training and professional competence. They take account of the CCBE Training Outcomes for European Lawyers of 2007.

The CCBE letter can be downloaded here.

Poland: Independence of the judiciary – EC takes second step in infringement procedure against Poland

September 13th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

Please read for the details the press release of the European Commission of 12/09.

European Commission acts to preserve the rule of law in Poland

July 26th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

Brussels, 26 July 2017 – Press release of the European Commission

The Commission substantiates its grave concerns on the planned reform of the judiciary in Poland in a Rule of Law Recommendation addressed to the Polish authorities. In the Commission’s assessment, this reform amplifies the systemic threat to the rule of law in Poland already identified in the rule of law procedure started by the Commission in January 2016. The Commission requests the Polish authorities to address these problems within one month. The Commission asks the Polish authorities notably not to take any measure to dismiss or force the retirement of Supreme Court judges. If such a measure is taken, the Commission stands ready to immediately trigger the Article 7(1) procedure[1] – a formal warning by the EU that can be issued by four fifths of the Member States in the Council of Ministers…

Continue to read here the full press release of the European Commission.

Poland: President will not sign Act on the Supreme Court and Act on the National Council of the Judiciary

July 25th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

On 24 July 2017, the President of the Republic of Poland declared that he will veto the bills on the Supreme Court and on the National Council of the Judiciary. However, the Act amending the Law on the Common Courts Organisation will be signed. Read more here.

Poland: CCBE expresses serious concerns over recent Acts on the judiciary

July 20th, 2017 § 0 comments § permalink

On 18 July 2017, the President of the CCBE addressed a letter to the President of the Republic of Poland expressing the CCBE’s concerns about the amendments adopted to the Polish Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and the Act amending the Law on Common Courts Organisation, as well as the new draft Act on the Supreme Court which the Polish Parliament received.

The CCBE points out that:

– The amendment to the Act of the National Council of the Judiciary gives a substantial role to politicians in the selection and appointment of judges, which contravenes the constitutional principle of independence of the judiciary.

– The Act amending the Law on the Common Courts Organisation – which changes the rules of appointing and recalling presidents of courts – increases the authority of the Minister of Justice by enabling the Minister to arbitrarily recall all the presidents of courts in Poland during their term of office.

– The draft Act on the Supreme Court foresees that all judges of the Supreme Court (save for those designated by the Minister of Justice) will retire immediately upon when the said Act enters into force.

The CCBE calls upon the President of the Republic of Poland to use the right of veto and to refuse to sign the above-mentioned amendments, as they are threatening the autonomy and independence of the judiciary.

Read the CCBE letter here.

The European Commission also discussed the latest developments with regard to the Polish judiciary and related legislative acts. In the Commission’s view “If implemented in their current form, these laws would have a very significant negative impact on the independence of the judiciary and would increase the systemic threat to the rule of law in Poland.” On 19 July 2017, the College of Commissioners held a first in-depth discussion on these new developments, expressed its serious concerns, and looked into the legal and political options available to the Commission to act upon these concerns. The Commission will revert again to this matter next week. For more information, click here.